INFORMATION NONSENSE MIX OF DIFFERENT STUPENYAM HIERARCHY OF NATURE |
In order not to confuse information belonging to the different levels of the hierarchy of nature, science deals with individual aspects:
1. The nuclei of atoms is considering nuclear physics! .. 2. Sami atoms and molecules in their compound - chemistry! .. 3. The connection of organic molecules - organic chemistry! .. 4. The connection of organic molecules in living cells and their varieties - biology! .. 5. Etc. And in science there is no doubt that confuse such information without specific to the research in various philosophical discussion, quite so stupid! .. But some modern philosophers have ignored the ban on mixing information! .. For example, Great Western philosopher, Karl Popper is what makes its findings based on data obtained from physics! .. And from that of physics, he gives us projections for the public the vital relationship between humans, although known that she is working on only лdead╗ matter, as it will not include any axiom, which would be dealt with explaining the phenomenon of life! .. Then we have nothing to be done, both to see what is the purpose of this is intended K. Popper? .. And it turns out that he wants us to prove: 1. On the one hand, completely separate the modern лdead╗ science and лdead╗ philosophy of лLiving╗ metaphysics and the лLiving╗ religion (K. Popper, Logic and the growth of scientific knowledge ", ed." Progress ", Moscow, 1983) ; 2. And, on the other hand, to show the failure of the philosophy of Karl Marx, the communist movement and totalitarianism in the management of society based on historical patterns change formations, arguing that history (appeals to the лgolden calves╗ лcapital╗ Karl Marx), nothing teaches (K. Popper, Poverty istoritsizma, Moscow, 1993). In contrast, he proposes the creation of so-called "open societies"! .. But the result of its proposed "open" society, without taking into account the need to respect their moral - ethical laws of God, again is preparing a proletarian, as in Karl Marx, without understanding лadd-ons╗ absolute economy vital energy of God! .. These proletarian лOrange Revolution╗ ready to engage in any organization, well-funded and high-paying, and no matter what ideology, until the terrorist. The mechanisms of the identity of such people is "democratic freedoms" without responsibility! .. A justification for this "freedom" - neskanchaemye debate - debate - divisions between them, where you can stay forever, the benefit, according to the Torah or the Bible, for "the construction of The Tower of Babel, God confused all languages or disputes! .. And so we are still in this лcaptivity╗, and only our Savior is not our boltologiya, лboltanie╗ language, as pagans, and the study and performance of the living Word of God, before us in the Scriptures. Werner Gitt, once again to deal with that, in his book лdid God through evolution?╗, Explores the basic provisions of a scientific theory, discuss the methods needed to acquire knowledge, and wishes to provide the tools assess the validity of scientific pronouncements: л1. Each theory requires a priori (regardless of experience) prerequisites (basic aksiomatichnyh provisions), the validity of which can not be proved. 2. The main provisions is arbitrary decisions, seemingly the author convincing. 3. Installed at the start of the main provisions must not contradict each other (no contradiction). 4. Inconsistency of the competing theories depends - apart from the fact that there may be errors in measurements and observations - not on facts but on disparities guidelines. 5. The main provisions can be objectively criticized and rejected. 6. The success of the theory, however, is no guarantee that it is accurate: лThus, the theory will never be empirically credible╗ (K. Popper). 7. Empirical research system should allow the checks by the experience. 8. As a consequence of their fundamental differences, there is a need to distinguish between formal and real science, and historically interpretiruemymi sciences. 9. In contrast to the laws of formal sciences (mathematics, computer science), all abstracts of empirical science unprovable, but to a greater or lesser extent justified: лAll the knowledge of the essence only an assumption. 10. In order to develop the theory, should have at least one practically achievable example (an experiment or observation). 11. The theory should allow the prediction. Confirmation of such forecasts is a prerequisite for recognition of the theory. ╗ Then Werner Gitt formulates the basic provisions of the evolutionary teachings: 1. л, Based on the principle of evolution. 2. Evolution is a universal principle. 3. The presence of the Creator (synonyms, type designer, plapiruyuschy spirit, deity) is excluded. 4. Our world, including all existing life forms, is extremely material basis. 5. Over the assumption of a fact that matter exists. 6. Between the world and the origin of life, as well as their development process, there is no difference in terms of the effectiveness of the laws of nature. 7. Evolution does prerequisite natural processes, allowing for greater organization from simple to complex, from non-living to live, from the lowest to the highest form of a species. These processes are characterized as лself matter╗. 8. As an evolutionary factors (= driving force of evolution) allowed: mutation, selection, isolation. 9. лMutations and breeding - engines of evolution╗ (K. Lorenz). 10. Death is a necessary evolutionary factor. H. Mor Biologist stresses: лIf there were no deaths, there would have been no life ...╗ 11. In evolution there is no plan or purpose. For evidence of premeditation in organic can not give any reason, because then would imply a creator: лFor the advisability of the structure and life of all organisms ... should not allow the sending of the mysterious ... moreover, when they occur there was no need to wise creator ╗(B. Rensh). 12. There is no specific source and destination temporary axis. So for the evolutionary process can be given any necessary in your view, even a very long time. 13. This is the key to the past. It follows that the current observations can be extrapolated (calculated on the basis of law) at any time in the past. 14. The transition from non-living life to happen smoothly. 15. Evolution is a process which is destined to continue in the future: лbecome Mononen planet comes, finally, in the intellectual stage of evolution, on the future course of which we can only guess ... Development of the Arrow, a tiny particle of which is each of us, indicates the direction of chaos to the intellectual, intergalakticheskomu sverhobraztsu ╗(Karsten Bresh).╗ As shown in the evolutionary theory that it is very limiting themselves, excluding the existence of the Creator! .. But then where there is creativity all of this evolutionary process, and particularly in humans? .. If it is rooted in natural law, who these laws when it installed? .. Therefore, Werner Gitt, and further formulates the basic provisions of exercises on the foundation of the world: 1. Over the basis of a principle foundation of the world. We come to understand all originally created only by the biblical way of thinking. Revelation Bible is the key to understanding this world. They are basic and do not replaceable source of information. 2. Creation - a universal principle, that is, the whole universe, like all life on earth, are the result of the process of creation. 3. There is the Creator. This Creator God is the Bible. When the Bible begins observing лIn the beginning God created the heavens and the earth╗, then it is in our understanding of the point. God is not a faucet not understand scientific phenomena, but the author of all existing - irrespective of whether we understand it scientifically or not. 4. All the material universe was created without the use of source material. In the Epistle to the Hebrews 11, 3 of this thesis is formulated so: лfaith know that ever arranged in the word of God, so that from an unseen seeming happened╗. 5. Regarding the operation of natural laws, there is a fundamental difference between the creation of the world and all life and the process after the creation. The laws of nature - the essence of the lessons from our physical experience of rule, under which constantly repeats the processes of natural phenomena and which operates in all their parts, the current work of art. 6. Creative act of God in the creation of peace can not be explained by natural laws, it can not interpret them in a limited part of this work. The process of creation, as such, is an exceptional event, in which only emerged in force today, the natural laws. We can look through the wall of ignorance about the creative action of God only to the extent that he makes us this possible through His Word. However, what God has opened to us through Scripture, is therefore essential information that we can not ignore and that can not be obtained otherwise. Rationale: The above argument becomes compelling in the case of a well-known law of conservation of energy, which shows that our world is not possible to obtain energy from nothing, as well as destroy. Origin лticking╗ energy in the universe can not be described any one of our well-known laws of nature. Consequently, the process of creation protekal outside the existing patterns now. 7. The Bible refers to the following factors foundation (= cause of the foundation): Х Word of God: Ps. 33,6; John. 1,1-4; EUR. 11, 3 Х power of God: Ier. 10.12 Х through the wisdom of God: Ps. 103.24; Ave. 3.19; Number. 1.2 Х by the will of God: Life. 1.26; Open. 4.11 Х through the Son of God: John. 1,1-4; John. 1.10; Number. 1,15-17; EUR. 1.26 Х characteristics of Jesus: Mat. 11,29; John. 10,11; John. 14.27 Х with the source material: EUR. 11.3 Х without the use of time: Ps. 33.6 These factors were strong during the six days of creation. They can not be explained by the laws of nature, but because poznayutsya faith (Hebrews 11.3). 8. The existence of objective presupposes the person who put it. Embedded in the concept of creation is an important indication of the Creator (Romans 1,19-20). 9. There is a source and destination of the timeline. Beginning noted Bytiem 1.1. Time and matter began to exist at the time of creation, in the same way they fit and the final item (Otkr. 10.66). 10. Past - the key to this. This refutes the argument to 13 evolutionary teachings. Without three certified Bible events of the past: creation, fall and flood the world - it is impossible to explain this. 11. The effects of the fall have had an impact on all the visible creation (Romans 8.20 +22). The destructive patterns in biology can not be explained in isolation from the fall. 12. Today''s geology of Earth can not be explained without the flood. 13. There is a clear distinction between living and non-living. 14. Creation of living creatures (core) completed. Creation of the core of all living creatures ( лon account of his╗), as illustrated in the book of Genesis 1, completed during the week of creation. Everything is later changes (eg, race), only the substance of the options originally created. ╗ And, as seen from above the main provisions of science that her theory can be: 1. As an evolution, which raises some questions, which is difficult to find the answers! .. 2. So based on the principle of creation, where aksiomatichnym information provided in the Scriptures, everything is at your place! .. A set conditions that the theory should be sure to try the first case to be impossible! .. Because how can we verify these theories, if any devices created by man are limited within certain limits the range of their actions, and also have a certain error in their measurements! .. Therefore, what in ancient religions, and is considered the most righteous, that every theory of religion, people studying it could check on their personal experiences of their lives! .. Hence, for example, and there was a classical system of yoga for a practical guide to verify the theory - sledges described in the scriptures, for example, the four Vedas Hindu religion! .. This is a situation arises that one of his stupidity did not prepare himself for this little, and let the blame on himself! |