GUIDE FOLLY INFORMATION OF SPIRITUAL BOTTOM IERARHI

Now we can say about the folly of modern science research, for example, Karl Popper, which are based on materialism challenged the existence of induction methods, mistaken Humanity deeper and deeper into atheism! .. Why? .. Because the research results of modern science is so deepened into a clean cloth that is really stupid to have and look what that traces of spirituality! .. This means that these research results are at the bottom of the spiritual hierarchy, where any criticism of the Spirit is not relevant! .. Who, being at the bottom of the spiritual hierarchy, is beginning to direct any criticism at the tenets of religion, likened �Lice� of the fable Krylov, which could not reach the grapes, and because of its persistently criticized! .. Werner Gitt, in his book �did God through evolution?�, Making it certain conclusions, writes: �1. From the theory of knowledge: There is no absolute knowledge through people. The idea that the human mind is independent from the perspective of modern scientific theory has proved untenable. Consequently, all human science conditionally, as clearly and Popper said: �Old scientific ideal, totally secure knowledge, has been idols. The requirement of scientific objectivity is the fact that every scientific thesis is conditional. Do not possess the knowledge and undeniable truth makes a scientist, a merciless, relentless search for truth �. Christian Believer in the Bible, should know that there is currently no scientific theoretical objections, which would be forbidden to explain the phenomenon of the world through the Bible (the doctrine of creation). Abstracts believer stem from Divine revelation, that is, from a source outside the human mind and who asks him to a solid object. Scientist who rose on the side of evolutionary teachings, may represent their models in the form of hypotheses, which - referring to Popper - are on shaky grounds marshland. 2. The study of Creation: The questions about the origin of the world it is impossible to give a clear answer without some revelation (of the mankind through the prophets). It should accept the Nobel Peace Prize laureate physicist V. Pauli, where he noted boundaries of scientific methods, where questions begin about the origin. Thus, the range of biblical rhetoric is much broader than science. Even if we clearly and logically explain the world through the teaching of creation, not everyone will agree with our model because she understands the living God and biblical truth. In a fully laicize science and highly liberalized theology should not be surprised by this. Popper shares plausible view that only the best theory is justified in science, which has already undergone a major inspection and has stood the severe test. If you apply this view of the doctrine of creation, it could count on its rapid spread. 3. Of theistic evolution: The authors theistic evolution literature biblical justification play only a secondary role. If they are quoting the Bible, only for the purpose of �deduct� out during the impassioned arguments of another meaning, namely evolutionary beginning. Such publications, many modern scientists, unfortunately, have sovlech themselves to the path of a false understanding of Scripture. � So that to refute Scripture religions, a researcher in the practice of their activities should be spiritually rise above their spiritual level! .. But using modern methods of science, according to the same Karl Popper, he can not do without the falsification of their research! .. If the course is almost spiritual does not rise to their understanding of, for example, improving themselves on eight stages of classical yoga! ..