IDEOLOGY KARL POPPER

IDEOLOGY KARL POPPER

KARL POPPER AND THE END OF CLASSICAL GERMAN MATERIALISM

Now, to compare how the idea evolved materialistic movement idolater, merely for what a hundred years of the twentieth century!.. Take a well-known scholar in the West - ideologue Karl Popper!..
In concluding his book "Poverty istoritsizma" and spread "Marxism" with shovels, as istoritsistskuyu fraud and deceptive, K. Popper has caused her "fatal blow" to develop and antidote against him for the future. The formula of the antidote is: "Everything looks as though, losing the continued peace, istoritsisty seeking compensation, firmly believing, change can be predicted because it is ruled by law abiding." However, this "antidote" itself could become a poison if you do not understand this axiom, and do not understand all that without losing a changing world, people want to receive compensation in the belief that change can be predicted because it is ruled by law abiding.
Therefore, it looks not like this wants to K. Popper, and as if he had not blacked out by the use of intellectual "kashe" their works as a protective motives. Psihologizm his rassudochnogo rational mind shows that he wants under the guise of "fight" with totalitarianism and istoritsizmom "(Karl Marx theory of revolutionary change formations) and other" isms "to attract the powerful and rich, inviting them to" the theory of light management societies "(people, nations, state, etc.) - a model of" open society ". And all the "scientific technological advances to present as an achievement of" open society ", in whose hands the huge capital investment. In this case, he enjoys "istoritsistskim" method of Bolshevism, that is The more supporters to his side, on the other side and the truth and strength. Although the same history has shown that Bolshevism collapsed, not even despite the enormous size, but remained a belief in a just society. (A. M. Gadjiev, R. A. Miller. Blesk and poverty K. Popper and his "open" society)
The result is the work of "open" society, the proposed K. Popper, without ethics, again is preparing proletarian as the Karl Marx ready to engage in any organization, well-funded and high-paying, and no matter what ideology, even Before the terrorist.
The mechanisms of the identity of such people is "Freedom without responsibility and justify this" freedom "- the eternal debate - debate - divisions between them, where you can stay forever, the benefit, according to the Torah and the Bible, for" the construction of The Tower of Babel, God confused all languages or disputes and, therefore, that we are still in this лcaptivity╗, and only our Savior is not our boltologiya, лboltanie╗ language, as pagans, and the Living Word of God presented to us in the Scriptures.
лFreedom - this is a very complex category. Ignorance, inability, unwillingness to understand its deeper meaning, creates a lot of evil. ... Evil, the constant satellite (a) freedom, occurs when a person endowed with free will, freedom in their deeds and actions, which somehow disappears from the World flow of Divine Grace. ╗
(K. I. Kulakov, M. лConsciousness and physical reality╗, vol.2, ╣ 2, 1997)
Danger to mankind is to increase the number of proletarian poor spiritually, but not property. We see that the bloodless revolution, induced K. Popper of Marxism, is still ongoing. Resisting this is the highest natural organization of humanity and theoretical sociology based not on the capital, while the absolute values of mankind, to implement the scientific approach to organizing and self-humanity, at least at the state level, for example Pharaoh''s confidence in times of famine expectations, governance Egypt Joseph ; To abide by the law of Sociology: preserving the unity of humankind and the blessing of each individual, but in the theory of knowledge, recognizing and taking into account the possibility of the existence of different levels of spiritual consciousness of rights and ethics.
The main labor K. Popper can be found in his works (K. Popper, Poverty istoritsizma, M., 1993, and K. Popper, Logic and the growth of scientific knowledge ", ed." Progress ", Moscow, 1983), and with the example of their analysis, with a spiritual perspective on the book (Gadjiev AM, R. A. Miller. Blesk and poverty K. Popper and his "open" society, Tashkent, 2001).
It is relevant only to recall that, because of the passion the Jewish people in times of the prophet Moses, лgolden calves╗, he broke the hearts of лThe first couple of tables Testament╗ of the people of God, you can believe related to the лgood╗ thinking person.
A passion for the same debate лOpen Society╗, which offers K. Popper, based on the achievement of modern materialist science, appellant only to rational thinking and putting at the forefront only material experience, due to errors devices and limited rights of individual experience, and therefore a sinner, According to the same K. Popper, lead only to лfalsification of speech╗. But it is also not new, because it is known that the Lord for the construction of лThe Tower of Babel╗ confused language-controversial human, and we should take only rational way of thinking, falls to paganism, uvlekayas rational conclusions лarguable╗ mathematical calculations.
Achieved, "the kingdom of heaven", as a society living in an atmosphere of constant disputes, feuds, evidence from a лBabel captivity╗, is not possible. Hence the debate program, based on the idea of "open society", apart from the debate on his rational "logic" does not give birth, although the old proverb says: "The dispute is born the truth!", But not a new debate. The idea of the "open society" leads to disaster and the growing extremism, terrorism and globalism, that is to the same "izmam", which strengthened both struggled K. Popper, that was the ideologue millionaires, monopolies and imperialism, trying to stifle its "poverty" at least some freedom and personal development as a person, and the public as a living organism .
"Behind the destruction of freedom has taken a kind of" smart "systems, the so-called" factory of thought "(" Think Thank ")," cerebral "group" attacks "," assault "and the like, corrupt and rob intellectuals, clean erasing process personalization of cards, depersonalization crowd rush to a false democracy. This promoted consumer science factories thought "based on group behavior, work and intellectual work pokupaemost customers, completely destroying freedom, and thus human conscience."
(A.M. Gadjiev, R.A. Miller. Blesk and
poverty K. Popper and his "open" society)
Ignore the teachings of ancient philosophers and to fight against communist ideas, caused by work Karl Marx and his followers, K. Popper, stayed in лwithin a conceptual framework╗ materialism, appealed to pogreshimomu experience, despite his genius in the research, it could not get out лVicious circle╗ (in Hinduism - Samsar), the lead only to poverty лfalsification of speech╗.
The principal mistake and Karl Marx, and K. Popper, was that they neglected categorization of Sciences established yet Aristotle. This classification is different in that Aristotle linked theoretical science with practical economics and practical politics only through the practical ethics, due to laws of God.
Increased accountability at all levels of consciousness and high academic communities will help the organization quickly finish the revolution "open society" proletarian - proletayuschih "by the possibility of a spiritual revival of activity on the self-with-knowledge, involvement in" I am "and the light of our Lord of All In their particular personal life - personal stories.
The great merit of K. Popper is that he is in his book "Poverty istoritsizma" questioned all the modern лWest╗ sociology as a science, not based on laws, which in practical terms, must approve the laws of ethics, behavior and development of human society And thus showed its dead-end path of development as false science.
But despite the fact that Karl Popper spoke yarym opponent of communism, we see that Western States democratic society, through his idea of creating a лOpen Society╗, still slowly dragged into лbloodless revolution╗, which was ideologist Karl Marx.
But many of the post Soviet space have already gone this way, within the Soviet Union. And now they likely will need to choose something лnew╗, and be back at the forefront of history.
The implication of "open society" and its materialist foundations can be understood by mankind malignancy лclean╗ materialism. But a return to Hegel''s idealism and L. Feyerbah not forthcoming, as well as from the classical period of German realism - a harmonious relationship, as materialism, and to the idealism of their neotryvnoy duality views - outside or inside the person. K. Popper understood by many as the beginning of something new, a new page in the history of human thought. In fact, in his works he showed the completion of pure materialism, and reached the Community Development and explanations of sociology.