Keter Sefira - CROWN FATHER STARTED AS A SOURCE OF THE PRINCIPLE More direct Middle Way DAAT - KNOWLEDGE IN PARALLEL - SERIAL necessary encoding

In the Kabbalah, Judaism there is the notion of the existence of Middle Lini get immediate direct knowledge of the Lord! But this line carefully concealed! Why? Because for the perception of the median line, a person must be carefully prepared: 1. And a thorough perception theories Oral Torah! 2. And the ideal execution of Experience spiritual teachers of mankind! To begin the substance of the problem with Aristotle! He is in his book Rhetoric wrote: "Good laws are drawn up primarily to how probably all identify themselves and leave as little as possible arbitrariness of judges, first, because it is easier to find one or a few, than many of those people who have the right mindset and are able to pass laws and issue sentences. In addition, the laws are the people on the basis of long-term thinking, court verdicts are pronounced the same in haste, so it is difficult for people, justice is good to distinguish between fair and useful. Since it is obvious that the right method for the ways of persuasion, but rather a means of persuasion have some sort of proof (for we are then most in something we see when we believe that anything is proved), the proof is the same rhetorical enthymeme, and this Generally speaking, is the most important way of persuasion, and as it is obvious that the enthymeme is a kind of syllogism, and that the consideration of any kind of syllogism relates to the field of dialectics - or in its entirety, or any part of it - it is clear that he who possesses the greatest ability to understand, of what and how a syllogism is made, he might be the most capable of enthymeme, when he will attach to the knowledge of syllogisms know what the deal enthymeme, and of how they differ from purely logical syllogisms, because that with the same abilities that we may know the truth and semblance of truth. However, people are by nature sufficiently able to find the truth and for the most part find it, because this resourceful in finding a plausible should be someone who is also resourceful in finding the truth itself. As for ways to prove actual or apparent way, as in dialectic there is guidance, and the apparent syllogism syllogism, just as there are here, because the example is nothing like guidance, enthymeme - a syllogism, the apparent enthymeme - the apparent syllogism. I call the enthymeme a rhetorical syllogism, as an example - a rhetorical guidance: for all speakers present their arguments or citing, or order enthymeme, and besides that do not use any method of proof. So what, if any, must prove that whatsoever, or by the syllogistic, or guidance (which is obvious to us from the "analysts"), each of these methods of proof necessarily coincide with each of the above. As for the differences between example and enthymeme, then it is obvious from the "Tops", as they previously said about the syllogism, and building: when on the basis of many such cases, the conclusion is derived on the cash flow of some fact, such a conclusion, there is guidance, here - an example. If you cash out any fact is that it is always or mostly a consequence of this fact, cash is cash of another, different from him the fact that this conclusion is there syllogism, enthymeme here. It is obvious that one or another kind of rhetorical argument has its merits. As we mentioned in the methodology, we find that here as well: some are rich in examples of speech, others - enthymeme; exactly the same and some of the speakers tend to examples of others - to the enthymeme. Speeches full of examples of not less than convincing, but more impressed by the speech, the rich enthymeme. " From the foregoing, Aristotle, taking his words: "I call the enthymeme a rhetorical syllogism, as an example - a rhetorical guidance", and comparing it with the Torah, we can mention: 1. Enthymeme a rhetorical syllogism will be halaha, identified by the Midrash - Torah study directly the texts! 2. A example - the rhetorical target for its Fairy Haggadah! That''s only if the person has in himself the experience of using both methods are theoretically owns: the principles of midrash - research and experience, only if he can reach the median line of Kabbalah of Judaism, which would be characterized as a parallel - serial encoding of the Scriptures For example, the Torah! These hand knowledge of theory and experience of Sefira Parental Beginning Keter transferred to the Men''s Home Sephiroth through the Seal Gimel, which manifest themselves in their activity! The difficulty of comprehension of this method is explainable by the fact that when a person has been sent to Earth, then her whole system of Sephiroth was overturned, and the highest Sefira Keter was hidden behind the cloth Elements Earth Elements in the inessential features! We can say that this element is only now opened and began to study modern physics, calling it "Elastic Void"! Using this direct learning from the Lord, with the discrimination of the Torah and the Gospel, and took the prophet Muhammad with the Koran!